modem7
10k Member
I've added new IBM 5170 information to my web site:
http://www.minuszerodegrees.net/index.htm
http://www.minuszerodegrees.net/index.htm
Kinda looks like LapLink to me; how about this link:... Here is where it's stored on this forum:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1103
Yes, noting that it will only be applicable to 5170s that have had their ST506/412 [MFM] class controller and drive upgraded to IDE-ATA class ones.Amongst other cool things I found was a program called IDE Identify v1.40. Running this program on a diskette in your 286 system will allow you to determine the drive information. It "..shows head, cylinder, and sector counts for CMOS setup parameters.
Yes, noting that it will only be applicable to 5170s that have had their ST506/412 [MFM] class controller and drive upgraded to IDE-ATA class ones.
No. ST506/412 [MFM] class drives do not have an equivalent to IDE-AT's 'Identify Drive' command.darn, I did not catch that. Is there a utility for the stock AT card?
There aren't many ST412/506 drives whose specs can't easily be found on the web...I did not know the identify drive command was what it was using, oh well, but my other trick is to put the drive in an XT class machine and run spinrite, to get the info needed to id the drive.
bd
In PC and XT class systems, certain hard drive software (e.g. SpeedStor) asks the MFM controller for the drive geometry (probably via INT 13h function 08h). The MFM controller reports the geometry that it has been configured for., oh well, but my other trick is to put the drive in an XT class machine and run spinrite, to get the info needed to id the drive.
Which statement/post was that in reference to?Woah there. The controller knows nothing about the drive geometry on an MFM drive.
In PC and XT class systems, certain hard drive software (e.g. SpeedStor) asks the MFM controller for the drive geometry (probably via INT 13h function 08h). The MFM controller reports the geometry that it has been configured for.
Chuck. I don't know why you're bringing the AT into the picture since the post you are referring to contains, "In PC and XT class systems". ATs are a different kettle of fish, and were not in scope of the post.The controller has no part in that conversation. In the case of an ST412-type drive, it's strictly a function of the BIOS, which, in the case of an AT, is on the motherboard anyway.
So, on my XT clone, with XT class hard disk controller, and ST-225, I fire up SpeedStor. SpeedStor reports a drive of 615 clinders / 4 heads. Surely SpeedStor is getting that information via INT 13h Function 08h (a BIOS call). In an XT, the code that that function calls resides in the expansion BIOS ROM on the controller.The controller has no part in that conversation.
Chuck. I don't know why you're bringing the AT into the picture since the post you are referring to contains, "In PC and XT class systems". ATs are a different kettle of fish, and were not in scope of the post.
So, on my XT clone, with XT class hard disk controller, and ST-225, I fire up SpeedStor. SpeedStor reports a drive of 615 clinders / 4 heads. Surely SpeedStor is getting that information via INT 13h Function 08h (a BIOS call). In an XT, the code that that function calls resides in the expansion BIOS ROM on the controller.
Of course, one must allow for posts in a thread deviating from topic. A thread can be started on RAM speed and end up on ROMs. This thread deviated into the scenario of ST506/412 class controllers/drives in XTs, and you commented on a post about that scenario.The thread is "More IBM 5170 Information". Nonetheless...
You write of a controller as being hardware only. It includes any firmware that's on it. I mean, I don't walk into a computer store and ask for a 'printer plus its firmware' - I ask for a printer. So in the example of a Xebec HDD controller for an XT, if I write code that ends up invoking the controller's firmware, then the 'controller' is part of the 'conversation'.(not the controller board, that collection of ICs such as he WD1010-5, WD1015-14 and WD1100-13 on a WD1002-WX2) has no part in the conversation.
The fact that I can remove the Xebec's ROM, place it on a different card, and observe that the XT still works, does not change the fact that when the firmware is on the controller, it is part of the controller.The code could just as easily reside on any card
Those statements make me think that you're speaking of ATs. The post you commented on was about PCs and XTs. I specifically scoped the post., or in the case of a DDO, in system RAM--the controller itself As a matter of fact, wasn't there an add-in card that had nothing more than a ROM on it for the purpose of expanding the drive list? In fact, the controller itself has no connection to the BIOS and cannot even access it.
As a matter of fact I'm not sure any more ;-)I am talking about drives one can't find. Otherwise what's the point of this thread